Texas Sues Contested 2020 Presidential Election States Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan

On Tuesday, December 8, the state of Texas filed an election lawsuit in the U.S. Supreme Court against four contested battleground states Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. The suit challenges the four states “administration of the 2020 presidential election.”

Screen Shot 2020-12-08 at 11.51.56 AM
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on reddit
Share on email

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in the suit is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to block the contested battleground states from casting “unlawful and constitutionally tainted votes” in the Electoral College and calls for “the Defendant States’ respective legislatures to appoint Presidential Electors in a manner consistent with the Electors Clause and pursuant to 3 U.S.C. § 2.”

The Bill Of Complaint begins by stating, “Our Country stands at an important crossroads. Either the Constitution matters and must be followed, even when some officials consider it inconvenient or out of date, or it is simply a piece of parchment on display at the National Archives. We ask the Court to choose the former.”

Continuing, “Lawful elections are at the heart of our constitutional democracy. The public, and indeed the candidates themselves, have a compelling interest in ensuring that the selection of a President—any President—is legitimate. If that trust is lost, the American Experiment will founder. A dark cloud hangs over the 2020 Presidential election.”

“Here is what we know. Using the COVID-19 pandemic as a justification, government officials in the defendant states of Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin, and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (collectively, “Defendant States”), usurped their legislatures’ authority and unconstitutionally revised their state’s election statutes. They accomplished these statutory revisions through executive fiat or friendly lawsuits, thereby weakening ballot integrity. Finally, these same government officials flooded the Defendant States with millions of ballots to be sent through the mails, or placed in drop boxes, with little or no chain of custody1 and, at the same time, weakened the strongest security measures protecting the integrity of the vote—signature verification and witness requirements.”

The suit alleges that “the 2020 election suffered from significant and unconstitutional irregularities in the Defendant States” which include non-legislative actors’ changing election laws unconstitutionally, voters being treated unequally across each state, and “The appearance of voting irregularities in the Defendant States that would be consistent with the unconstitutional relaxation of ballot-integrity protections in those States’ election laws”.

“All these flaws – even the violations of state election law – violate one or more of the federal requirements for elections (i.e., equal protection, due process, and the Electors Clause) and thus arise under federal law.“

The suit claims that “these flaws cumulatively preclude knowing who legitimately won the 2020 election and threaten to cloud all future elections.”

Read the full suit here.

Support Quality Journalism.

Independent journalism is important now more than ever. The role of journalists in our society is one of watchdogs. One cannot be a watchdog when they are on the government’s payroll. 

Make a donation today and support quality,  independent journalism. 

Share this story:

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on email